Articles

Konsep Aksiologi Ilmu dalam Perspektif Barat dan Islam serta Implikasinya terhadap Pendidikan Agama Islam

485
Abstract Views
479
PDF Downloads
Download PDF

Abstract

The development of contemporary science has generated divergent value orientations between Western and Islamic traditions. Western science emphasizes objectivity, value neutrality, and technical-empirical aspects, whereas the Islamic tradition integrates moral and spiritual values with the pursuit of public benefit (maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah). These differences have significant implications for Islamic Religious Education (IRE), particularly in shaping students’ character, ethics, and spirituality. This study aims to analyze the concept of the axiology of knowledge from Western and Islamic perspectives and to examine its implications for IRE practices. The research employs a qualitative approach through library research, involving a systematic review of primary and secondary literature on Western and Islamic philosophy of science, the axiology of knowledge, and education. Data were analyzed using descriptive-analytical and comparative methods to interpret value orientations, the purposes of knowledge, and their educational implications within both traditions. The findings indicate that Western science initially emphasized value neutrality and objectivity; however, contemporary discourse increasingly highlights the integration of ethics and moral values. In contrast, the Islamic scientific tradition consistently integrates revelation, reason, and empirical experience within a moral, spiritual, and public-benefit-oriented framework. These findings underscore that IRE should be developed holistically by integrating cognitive, ethical, and spiritual dimensions, enabling students to become not only intellectually competent but also morally grounded and socially responsible. The novelty of this article lies in its comparative analysis of Western and Islamic axiological paradigms as a means of strengthening IRE as a platform for character formation and a moral filter in responding to modern science and technology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Adamson, P. (2016). Philosophy in the Islamic world: A history of philosophy without any gaps. Oxford University Press.
  2. Ahwani, M. A., Syahlarriyadi, & Sutarto. (2025). Model perencanaan pembelajaran PAI integratif berbasis kompetensi abad ke-21 menuju generasi emas Indonesia 2045. SYAIKHONA: Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Agama Islam, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.59166/syaikhona.v3i2.332
  3. Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1995a). Islam and secularism. ISTAC.
  4. Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1995b). Prolegomena to the metaphysics of Islam: An exposition of the fundamental elements of the worldview of Islam. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.
  5. Al-Faruqi, I. R. (1984). Islamization of knowledge: General principles and workplan. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
  6. Al-Ghazali, A. H. (2000). Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din (Vols. 1–4). Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
  7. Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. Herndon, VA: The International Institute of Islamic Thought.
  8. Audi, R. (2011). Epistemology: A contemporary introduction to the theory of knowledge (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  9. Asmah, N. A. (2024). Ilmu dalam perspektif Islam serta penerapan dalam kesehatan gigi dan mulut. CV. Eureka Media Aksara.
  10. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage Publications.
  11. Comte, A. (1974). The positive philosophy (H. Martineau, Trans.). AMS Press. (Original work published 1830)
  12. Daud, W. M. N. W. (2019). The educational philosophy and practice of Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas: An exposition of the original concept of Islamization. UTM Press.
  13. Descartes, R. (1998). Meditations on first philosophy (J. Cottingham, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1641)
  14. Habermas, J. (1984). Knowledge and human interests. Beacon Press.
  15. Hidayat, R., & Aprison, W. (2025). Perspektif Islam dan Barat dalam paradigma aksiologi pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 9(1), 4389–4399. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v9i1.26894
  16. Marzuki, I., Johra, J., Arwansyah, A., Asrudin, A., Zaenal, Z., Harimuswarah, M. R., Syahrir, M., Ramli, M., & Hadi, A. (2021). Filsafat ilmu di era milenial. Fakultas Teknik Universitas Fajar. ISBN 978-623-97118-0-1
  17. Nasr, S. H. (1996). Knowledge and the sacred. State University of New York Press.
  18. Nurdiyanto, Jamal, Isnaini, N. A., & Yulianti, F. (2023). Landasan filosofis-teologis dalam kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam. Al Mikraj: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora, 4(1), 889–912. https://doi.org/10.37680/almikraj.v4i1.4204
  19. Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy. Harvard University Press.
  20. Puspa, C. I. S., Rahayu, D. N. O., & Parhan, M. (2023). Transformasi pendidikan abad 21 dalam merealisasikan sumber daya manusia unggul menuju Indonesia Emas 2045. Jurnal Basicedu, 7(5), 3309–3321. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i5.5030
  21. Saturnus. (2024). Teknologi sebagai kegiatan manusia dalam era modern kehidupan masyarakat. Saturnus: Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi, 2(3), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.61132/saturnus.v2i3.157
  22. Sahib, M., & Rahmatia, R. (2025). Filsafat keilmuan rasionalisme dan empirisme terhadap perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan modern. J-CEKI: Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 4(5), 1372–1374. https://doi.org/10.56799/jceki.v4i5.10907
  23. Syafriandi, Fatimah, S., & Fitrisia, A. (2025). Aksiologi: Peran filsafat ilmu dalam transformasi nilai dalam masyarakat. Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 5(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v5i1.2512
  24. Syihab, M. B. (2023). Telaah kritis pemikiran Jasser Auda dalam buku Maqasid al-Shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. An-Nur: Jurnal Studi Islam, 15(2), 113–136. https://jurnalannur.ac.id/index.php/An-Nur
  25. Taufik, T. A., & Subagjo, I. (Penyunt.). (2001). Menumbuhkembangkan pemanfaatan sumber daya lokal dan perlindungan aset intelektual bangsa. Pusat Pengkajian Kebijakan Teknologi, Pengembangan Unggulan Daerah dan Peningkatan Kapasitas Masyarakat, Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi (BPPT). http://unggulan.net
  26. Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. University of Chicago Press.
  27. Zed, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Copyright & License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Indexed & Abstracted In

Chat Support